Argentina Subastas Wiki

Bernardo Delgado e Hijos S.R.L. s/ concurso preventivo (Chubut, 1993) — Order Returning Vehicles Seized by the Pledgee to the Concursada Is Appealable

Properties6
jurisdictionAR
legal_systemcivil-law
authorityCámara de Apelaciones en lo Civil, Comercial, Laboral y de Minería (Chubut), 'Bernardo Delgado e Hijos S.R.L. s/ concurso preventivo — recurso de queja', interlocutorio, 19/03/1993 — SAIJ sumario SUQ0002133
descriptionChubut appellate court, 19 March 1993. In a concurso preventivo the first-instance judge ordered vehicles that a pledge creditor had seized (secuestrados) to be returned to the debtor company, and refused leave to appeal under the general rule of non-appealability. The Cámara admitted the queja: the order modified a precautionary measure in the execution of a pledge-secured credit, which the concursal law's art. 25 in fine makes appealable together with orders suspending the subasta. Known only through one official SAIJ sumario — full text not retrieved; holding `needs_verification`.
last_verified2026-10-18
tagscasos, jurisprudencia, concurso-preventivo, prenda-con-registro, secuestro-prendario, automotores, chubut, provincial, argentina

3 min read

Argentina (AR) — civil law.

Nothing on this page describes United States practice. There is no certificate sold to an investor, no administrative sale of land for unpaid tax, and no redemption window after a subasta judicial in Argentina. If you arrived carrying US assumptions, read falsos-amigos first.

needs_verification — holding known only from an official SAIJ sumario.

The quoted holding is the text of SAIJ sumario SUQ0002133, re-retrieved 2026-10-18. A sumario is not the decision: the full text was not retrieved (the SAIJ catalogue entry has no attachment, and a search of the Poder Judicial del Chubut’s Eureka database on 2026-10-18 returned no full text for this case). Do not treat the holding as verified.

Bernardo Delgado e Hijos S.R.L. s/ concurso preventivo — recurso de queja

FieldValue
CourtCámara de Apelaciones en lo Civil, Comercial, Laboral y de Minería — Comodoro Rivadavia seat (Chubut), per the SAIJ catalogue entry FA93150094 (interlocutorio); judges listed there: Julio Antonio Alexandre, Fernando Nahuelanca, Daniel Luis Caneo
Date19 March 1993
CaptionBernardo Delgado e Hijos S.R.L. s/ Concurso Preventivo Recurso de Queja
Official recordSAIJ sumario SUQ0002133 (fuente: OFICIAL); SAIJ catalogue entry for the decision (metadata only, no full text attached): FA93150094, https://www.saij.gob.ar/view-document?guid=123456789-490-0513-9ots-eupmocsollaf
Norms cited”art. 296 inc. 3° de LC” (general non-appealability) and “art. 25 ‘in fine’” of the same law — the concursal statute then in force. SAIJ’s normative references point to ‘TOR C 019550 1984’ (the 1984 consolidated text of Ley 19.550), which looks like an indexing error for the concursal law then in force — needs_verification
ScopeConcursal law (national) applied by a Chubut court; Chubut procedure for the appeal

Read the rest with a free account

The opening section is open to everyone. The procedure in detail — statutes, deadlines, who may bid, and what the record does not say — is behind a free account.

We ask for one because writing these from primary sources is slow work, and knowing who relies on it tells us which country to do next.

Create a free account Sign in

Graph View

Backlinks