Argentina Subastas Wiki

Consorcio Libertador 2687 c/ Sanchiño Molina (CNCiv. Sala H, 2016) — Pay the Arrears or Face a Second Auction

Properties6
jurisdictionAR
legal_systemcivil-law
authorityCNCiv., Sala H, expte. 91611/2011, 'Cons. de Prop. Av. Libertador 2687/89/91 c/ Sanchiño Molina, Juan Julián y otro s/ ejecución de expensas', 30/09/2016
descriptionCámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Civil, Sala H, 30 September 2016 (Kiper and Fajre; Abreut de Begher dissenting). Under Ley 13.512 arts. 8 and 17 and Código Civil art. 3266 — 'ya actual art. 2049 del Código Civil y Comercial' — the consorcio may demand that the auction buyer deposit the full pre-purchase expensas debt in the expensas suit, on pain of a new remate; the buyer's liability is capped at the unit.
last_verified2026-10-09
tagscasos, jurisprudencia, expensas, propter-rem, caba, argentina

5 min read

Argentina (AR) — civil law.

Nothing on this page describes United States practice. There is no certificate sold to an investor, no administrative sale of land for unpaid tax, and no redemption window after a subasta judicial in Argentina. If you arrived carrying US assumptions, read falsos-amigos first.

Cons. de Prop. Av. Libertador 2687/89/91 c/ Sanchiño Molina, Juan Julián y otro s/ ejecución de expensas

FieldValue
CourtCámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Civil, Sala H
Expediente91611/2011
Signed30 September 2016
MajorityKiper, Fajre
DissentAbreut de Begher (concurring in result, different reasoning)
ResultFirst-instance order confirmed; costs to the appellant buyer
SourceSigned decision, PJN document (via abogados.com.ar)

Read the rest with a free account

The opening section is open to everyone. The procedure in detail — statutes, deadlines, who may bid, and what the record does not say — is behind a free account.

We ask for one because writing these from primary sources is slow work, and knowing who relies on it tells us which country to do next.

Create a free account Sign in

Graph View

Backlinks