Argentina Subastas Wiki

Cuéllar de Yurquina c/ Arroyo (STJ Jujuy, 1996) — Same-Day Edictos and a Low Price Do Not Annul a Remate

Properties6
jurisdictionAR
legal_systemcivil-law
authoritySuperior Tribunal de Justicia de Jujuy, 'Eulalia Cuéllar de Yurquina c/ Carlos Arroyo s/ recurso de casación', expte. 5028/95, 12/03/1996, SAIJ sumario SUW0000339
descriptionSuperior Tribunal de Justicia de Jujuy, 12 March 1996. A remate is a procedural act and its nullity is read restrictively. That the last edicto appeared the morning of an afternoon auction does not invalidate the sale; the publicity defect must be grave enough to defeat the auction's purpose. A low price is not a ground either, because forced sales predictably fetch less than private ones. Jujuy's CPCC art. 496 applied.
last_verified2026-10-09
tagscasos, jurisprudencia, nulidad-de-subasta, edictos, precio-vil, jujuy, provincial, argentina

4 min read

Argentina (AR) — civil law.

Nothing on this page describes United States practice. There is no certificate sold to an investor, no administrative sale of land for unpaid tax, and no redemption window after a subasta judicial in Argentina. If you arrived carrying US assumptions, read falsos-amigos first.

Eulalia Cuéllar de Yurquina c/ Carlos Arroyo s/ recurso de casación

FieldValue
CourtSuperior Tribunal de Justicia de Jujuy
Date12 March 1996
Expediente5028/95
CitationSAIJ sumario SUW0000339 (fuente oficial)
RouteRecurso de casación
NormCódigo Procesal Civil de Jujuy (Ley 1967), art. 496 (as referenced by SAIJ)

Read the rest with a free account

The opening section is open to everyone. The procedure in detail — statutes, deadlines, who may bid, and what the record does not say — is behind a free account.

We ask for one because writing these from primary sources is slow work, and knowing who relies on it tells us which country to do next.

Create a free account Sign in

Graph View

Backlinks