Argentina Subastas Wiki

Escandarani c/ Fagre (CNCom. Sala D, 1998) — A Debt Announced in the Edicto Is Part of the Price

Properties6
jurisdictionAR
legal_systemcivil-law
authorityCNCom., Sala D, 'Escandarani, Elías c/ Fagre, Juan s/ ejecución', 05/03/1998, SAIJ sumario SUN0007937
descriptionCámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial, Sala D, 5 March 1998. Where the edicto and the martillero's flyer told bidders that the unit carried a debt with the consorcio, the consorcio cannot have those expensas paid out of the price: the economic function of CPCCN art. 566 is that the price bidders pay is composed of the hammer amount plus the announced debt, so the buyer contributes the published figure. An ambiguous edicto entitles the bidder to ask, not to be surprised.
last_verified2026-10-09
tagscasos, jurisprudencia, expensas, edictos, propter-rem, caba, argentina

5 min read

Argentina (AR) — civil law.

Nothing on this page describes United States practice. There is no certificate sold to an investor, no administrative sale of land for unpaid tax, and no redemption window after a subasta judicial in Argentina. If you arrived carrying US assumptions, read falsos-amigos first.

Escandarani, Elías c/ Fagre, Juan s/ ejecución

FieldValue
CourtCámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial, Sala D
Date5 March 1998
CitationSAIJ sumario SUN0007937 (fuente oficial)
NormCPCCN art. 566 (content of the edicto for a propiedad horizontal unit)
ContextEjecución de sentencia; a unit of the ejecutado sold at subasta; the consorcio asked to be paid from the price

Read the rest with a free account

The opening section is open to everyone. The procedure in detail — statutes, deadlines, who may bid, and what the record does not say — is behind a free account.

We ask for one because writing these from primary sources is slow work, and knowing who relies on it tells us which country to do next.

Create a free account Sign in

Graph View

Backlinks