Argentina Subastas Wiki

González c/ Jiménez (STJ Jujuy, 2020) — The Subasta Buyer Beats a Fraudulent Later Deed From the Ejecutado

Properties6
jurisdictionAR
legal_systemcivil-law
authoritySuperior Tribunal de Justicia de Jujuy, Sala I, 'González, Miguel Orlando c/ Jiménez, Néstor Tomás; Costas, Ana Clelia del Valle', 10/03/2020, SAIJ sumario SUW0002785
descriptionSuperior Tribunal de Justicia de Jujuy, Sala I, 10 March 2020. After the property had been sold at subasta — price paid, martillero's accounts approved, possession ordered — the ejecutado conveyed it by escritura to a third party who became titular registral. Applying CCyC art. 399 (nadie puede transmitir un derecho mejor o más extenso que el que tiene), the court preferred the adquirente en subasta and annulled the escrituras as fraudulent.
last_verified2026-10-09
tagscasos, jurisprudencia, nulidad-de-subasta, adquirente, buena-fe, jujuy, provincial, argentina

4 min read

Argentina (AR) — civil law.

Nothing on this page describes United States practice. There is no certificate sold to an investor, no administrative sale of land for unpaid tax, and no redemption window after a subasta judicial in Argentina. If you arrived carrying US assumptions, read falsos-amigos first.

González, Miguel Orlando c/ Jiménez, Néstor Tomás; Costas, Ana Clelia del Valle

FieldValue
CourtSuperior Tribunal de Justicia de Jujuy, Sala I
Date10 March 2020
CitationSAIJ sumario SUW0002785 (sumario prepared by SAIJ from the decision)
Norm[[nacion/codigo-civil-y-comercial
ResultDeeds (escrituras de compraventa) executed by the ejecutado after the subasta annulled; buyer at the subasta preferred

Read the rest with a free account

The opening section is open to everyone. The procedure in detail — statutes, deadlines, who may bid, and what the record does not say — is behind a free account.

We ask for one because writing these from primary sources is slow work, and knowing who relies on it tells us which country to do next.

Create a free account Sign in

Graph View

Backlinks