Argentina Subastas Wiki

Plásticos Silvatrim s/ quiebra (CSJN, 2004) — Once the Remate Is Approved, a Court Cannot Annul It Under Cover of a Narrow Appeal

Properties6
jurisdictionAR
legal_systemcivil-law
authorityCSJN, 'Plásticos Silvatrim S.A. s/ quiebra s/ incidente de subasta', 06/07/2004, recurso extraordinario against CNCom. — SAIJ sumarios SUN0012760–SUN0012763 (del dictamen del Procurador Fiscal, que la Corte comparte)
descriptionCSJN, 6 July 2004. In a quiebra, the buyers appealed only the refusal to register one parcela that had not appeared in the constatación, the edictos or the boleto. The Cámara instead annulled the whole subasta de oficio, ordered the price returned and a new auction. The Supreme Court set that aside: the ruling exceeded the competence opened by the appeal and overrode firm decisions — price paid, possession delivered, dominio inscribed, remate approved — breaching cosa juzgada, preclusión, defence and property. The CSJN statement of what the auto de aprobación protects.
last_verified2026-10-09
tagscasos, jurisprudencia, nulidad-de-subasta, nulidad-de-oficio, auto-de-aprobacion, cosa-juzgada, csjn, argentina

6 min read

Argentina (AR) — civil law.

Nothing on this page describes United States practice. There is no certificate sold to an investor, no administrative sale of land for unpaid tax, and no redemption window after a subasta judicial in Argentina. If you arrived carrying US assumptions, read falsos-amigos first.

Plásticos Silvatrim S.A. s/ quiebra s/ incidente de subasta

FieldValue
CourtCorte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación
Date6 July 2004
RouteRecurso extraordinario (Ley 48, art. 14) brought by the adquirentes en subasta against a ruling of the Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial
CitationSAIJ sumarios SUN0012760, SUN0012761, SUN0012762, SUN0012763 (06/07/2004); Fallos volume and page, and the CSJN docket letter, needs_verification
BelowCNCom. — annulled the subasta de oficio, ordered restitution of the price and a new auction
BasisDictamen del Procurador Fiscal, which the Court shared (“que la Corte comparte”)
ResultLower ruling set aside (“dejar sin efecto”)

Read the rest with a free account

The opening section is open to everyone. The procedure in detail — statutes, deadlines, who may bid, and what the record does not say — is behind a free account.

We ask for one because writing these from primary sources is slow work, and knowing who relies on it tells us which country to do next.

Create a free account Sign in

Graph View

Backlinks